We appreciate your visit to Step 1 tex frac 32 40 frac 20 PR tex Step 2 tex 20PR 32 48 tex Step 3 tex 2 times PR 1 536. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Let's walk through the steps to find Valek's first error:
1. Step 1: Understanding the Equation
The proportion given is:
[tex]\[
\frac{32}{40} = \frac{20}{PR}
\][/tex]
The goal is to solve for [tex]\( PR \)[/tex].
2. Step 2: Setting Up the Cross-Product
According to the rules of cross-multiplication, the setup would be:
[tex]\[
32 \times PR = 20 \times 40
\][/tex]
This equation simplifies the comparison in terms of [tex]\( PR \)[/tex].
3. Step 3: Simplification
The equation simplifies further to:
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{20 \times 40}{32}
\][/tex]
4. Step 4: Solve [tex]\( PR \)[/tex] Calculation Issue
Valek attempts to solve for [tex]\( PR \)[/tex] using:
[tex]\[
20 \times PR = 32 \times 48
\][/tex]
Hence,
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{1536}{20}
\][/tex]
5. Step 5: Valek's Error Identification
Valek states in Step 4 that:
[tex]\[
PR = 76.8 \text{ km}
\][/tex]
However, the calculation for:
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{1536}{20} = 76.8
\][/tex]
is correct, indicating a calculation mistake in their earlier stages.
Based on the analysis:
- Valek did not correctly implement the cross-product initially which should have been:
[tex]\[
32 \times PR = 20 \times 40
\][/tex]
Instead, they put it as:
[tex]\[
20 \times PR = 32 \times 48
\][/tex]
So, Valek's first error is in setting up the cross-product improperly. The correct answer is: Valek should have written the cross-product in step 2 as [tex]\( 32 \times PR = (20 \times 40) \)[/tex].
1. Step 1: Understanding the Equation
The proportion given is:
[tex]\[
\frac{32}{40} = \frac{20}{PR}
\][/tex]
The goal is to solve for [tex]\( PR \)[/tex].
2. Step 2: Setting Up the Cross-Product
According to the rules of cross-multiplication, the setup would be:
[tex]\[
32 \times PR = 20 \times 40
\][/tex]
This equation simplifies the comparison in terms of [tex]\( PR \)[/tex].
3. Step 3: Simplification
The equation simplifies further to:
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{20 \times 40}{32}
\][/tex]
4. Step 4: Solve [tex]\( PR \)[/tex] Calculation Issue
Valek attempts to solve for [tex]\( PR \)[/tex] using:
[tex]\[
20 \times PR = 32 \times 48
\][/tex]
Hence,
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{1536}{20}
\][/tex]
5. Step 5: Valek's Error Identification
Valek states in Step 4 that:
[tex]\[
PR = 76.8 \text{ km}
\][/tex]
However, the calculation for:
[tex]\[
PR = \frac{1536}{20} = 76.8
\][/tex]
is correct, indicating a calculation mistake in their earlier stages.
Based on the analysis:
- Valek did not correctly implement the cross-product initially which should have been:
[tex]\[
32 \times PR = 20 \times 40
\][/tex]
Instead, they put it as:
[tex]\[
20 \times PR = 32 \times 48
\][/tex]
So, Valek's first error is in setting up the cross-product improperly. The correct answer is: Valek should have written the cross-product in step 2 as [tex]\( 32 \times PR = (20 \times 40) \)[/tex].
Thanks for taking the time to read Step 1 tex frac 32 40 frac 20 PR tex Step 2 tex 20PR 32 48 tex Step 3 tex 2 times PR 1 536. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada