Which statement is correct regarding headlong flight from law enforcement?

a) It constitutes probable cause.
b) It constitutes reasonable suspicion in and of itself.
c) It may constitute reasonable suspicion if other indicators of criminal activity are present.
d) It does not constitute reasonable suspicion.

Question

26-11-2023
Law

College

We appreciate your visit to Which statement is correct regarding headlong flight from law enforcement a It constitutes probable cause b It constitutes reasonable suspicion in and of itself c. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Which statement is correct regarding headlong flight from law enforcement?

a) It constitutes probable cause.
b) It constitutes reasonable suspicion in and of itself.
c) It may constitute reasonable suspicion if other indicators of criminal activity are present.
d) It does not constitute reasonable suspicion.

Answer :

Other Questions

Which is a better deal: a 12 oz. bag of chips for

The molar mass of nickel, Ni, is [tex]58.69 \, \text{g/mol}[/tex]. How many

Which are sums of perfect cubes? Check all that apply. A. [tex]8x^6

Assume that the heights of college women are normally distributed, with a

Is a deep ache in the right shoulder blade a sign of

What is a blanket unilateral offer? A. An offer of subagency to

Course: S/P2 Automotive Service Safety Activity: Module 5: Respirators/Air Quality Quiz Respirators

A researcher believes that women today weigh less than in previous years.

Find the area of the shaded region. 5x2 + 28x + 21

Which of Swift's sisters loved to wrestle?

vignesh67 vignesh67 · Answer 1 · 2023-10-21T18:34:53-04:00

Final answer:

Headlong flight from law enforcement may constitute reasonable suspicion if other indicators of criminal activity are present.

Explanation:

Headlong flight from law enforcement may constitute reasonable suspicion if other indicators of criminal activity are present. The correct statement regarding headlong flight from law enforcement is that it may constitute reasonable suspicion if other indicators of criminal activity are present. This position is grounded in the legal standards stemming from Supreme Court rulings such as Terry v. Ohio (1968), which established that reasonable suspicion is sufficient for police to stop and frisk individuals if they believe a crime has been committed, is in process, or is about to be committed. It is important to distinguish between 'reasonable suspicion' and probable cause; the latter is a higher standard used for issuing warrants or arresting someone without a warrant when a felony is suspected.