Answer :

Final answer:

Reasonable suspicion is not a higher standard than probable cause; it is actually lower. Probable cause requires more substantial evidence for arrests or searches, while reasonable suspicion requires only specific and articulable facts. Understanding these standards is crucial in law enforcement and legal proceedings.


Explanation:

Understanding Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause


The statement "Reasonable suspicion is a higher standard than probable cause" is False. In fact, it is the opposite: probable cause is a higher legal standard than reasonable suspicion.


Reasonable suspicion is the standard used in criminal procedure that allows law enforcement to briefly detain a person for questioning and to conduct a limited search, but it requires specific and articulable facts indicating that a person may be involved in criminal activity. For example, if an officer sees someone behaving suspiciously near a known drug area, they may have reasonable suspicion to investigate further.


On the other hand, probable cause is a stronger standard of proof that requires a reasonable belief that a crime has been or will be committed. It is the threshold needed for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest, obtain a search warrant, or conduct a more invasive search. For instance, if the officer finds illegal substances or evidence tying an individual to a crime, this provides probable cause for an arrest.


In summary, reasonable suspicion allows for temporary detainment based on lower thresholds of evidence, while probable cause requires a higher level of evidence to justify arrests or searches.


Learn more about Legal Standards here:

https://brainly.com/question/37467472


Thanks for taking the time to read Reasonable suspicion is a higher standard than probable cause A True B False. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada