College

We appreciate your visit to In the field of law a U S Supreme Court justice who joins the majority opinion but has different legal reasons for agreeing with the. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

In the field of law, a U.S. Supreme Court justice who joins the majority opinion but has different legal reasons for agreeing with the majority will often write what kind of opinion?

A. Concurring opinion
B. Dissenting opinion
C. Plurality opinion
D. Unanimous opinion

Answer :

Final answer:

A U.S. Supreme Court Justice who agrees with the majority decision but for different reasons will write a 'concurring opinion', reflecting their unique interpretation of the law or Constitution.

Explanation:

In the field of law, specifically within the U.S. Supreme Court, a justice who agrees with the majority on the outcome of a case, but has differing legal reasons for their agreement, will typically write a concurring opinion. A concurring opinion provides the justice's unique perspective and rationale, separate from the main reasoning provided in the majority opinion. Thus, this allows the justice to voice their distinct interpretation of the law or Constitution, while still affirming the decision made by the majority.

Remember, not every justice that agrees with the majority decision will write a concurring opinion, it's usually done when the justice has fundamentally different reasons for reaching the same verdict. On the other hand, if a justice disagrees with the majority decision, they would write a dissenting opinion. A unanimous decision involves all justices agreeing on the opinion, and a plurality opinion happens when an opinion is supported by more justices than any other but does not have the support of the majority (more than half).

Learn more about Concurring Opinion here:

https://brainly.com/question/32703401

#SPJ11

Thanks for taking the time to read In the field of law a U S Supreme Court justice who joins the majority opinion but has different legal reasons for agreeing with the. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada