We appreciate your visit to Analyze the work used to write an equivalent equation for tex y tex tex 3y 36 5x tex 1 Divide both sides by 3 frac. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
First, we need to solve for [tex]\( y \)[/tex] from the equation [tex]\( 3y = 36 - 5x \)[/tex] and analyze the given work for correctness.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Original Equation:
[tex]\[
3y = 36 - 5x
\][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 3 to isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[
\frac{3y}{3} = \frac{36 - 5x}{3}
\][/tex]
3. Simplify both sides:
- For the left-hand side (LHS):
[tex]\[
\frac{3y}{3} = y
\][/tex]
This simplifies to:
[tex]\[
y = \frac{36}{3} - \frac{5x}{3}
\][/tex]
- For the right-hand side (RHS):
[tex]\[
\frac{36}{3} - \frac{5x}{3}
\][/tex]
Simplifying each term individually:
[tex]\[
\frac{36}{3} = 12
\][/tex]
and
[tex]\[
\frac{5x}{3} = \frac{5}{3}x
\][/tex]
4. Combine the simplified terms on the right-hand side:
[tex]\[
y = 12 - \frac{5}{3} x
\][/tex]
So, the equivalent equation for [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[
y = 12 - \frac{5}{3} x
\][/tex]
### Analysis of the Given Work:
1. First Choice: "The work was completed correctly."
- This statement is correct. The provided solution shows the correct steps to isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex] and simplifies both sides properly.
2. Second Choice: "Both sides needed to be multiplied by 3, rather than divided by 3."
- This statement is incorrect. Multiplying both sides by 3 would not isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex]. We needed to divide both sides by 3 to solve for [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
3. Third Choice: "When dividing 36 by 3, the answer should have been [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex], not 12."
- This statement is incorrect. The correct division of 36 by 3 is indeed 12, not [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex].
4. Fourth Choice: "Both terms on the right side need to be divided by 3, not just the 36."
- This statement is also correct. Both 36 and [tex]\( -5x \)[/tex] were accurately divided by 3 in the original work.
### Conclusion:
- Correct Work Statement: The work was completed correctly.
- Incorrect Work Statements: Both sides needed to be multiplied by 3, rather than divided by 3. When dividing 36 by 3, the answer should have been [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex], not 12. Both terms on the right side need to be divided by 3, not just the 36.
From this analysis, we conclude that the work was done correctly. The correct choice is the first one.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Original Equation:
[tex]\[
3y = 36 - 5x
\][/tex]
2. Divide both sides by 3 to isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[
\frac{3y}{3} = \frac{36 - 5x}{3}
\][/tex]
3. Simplify both sides:
- For the left-hand side (LHS):
[tex]\[
\frac{3y}{3} = y
\][/tex]
This simplifies to:
[tex]\[
y = \frac{36}{3} - \frac{5x}{3}
\][/tex]
- For the right-hand side (RHS):
[tex]\[
\frac{36}{3} - \frac{5x}{3}
\][/tex]
Simplifying each term individually:
[tex]\[
\frac{36}{3} = 12
\][/tex]
and
[tex]\[
\frac{5x}{3} = \frac{5}{3}x
\][/tex]
4. Combine the simplified terms on the right-hand side:
[tex]\[
y = 12 - \frac{5}{3} x
\][/tex]
So, the equivalent equation for [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[
y = 12 - \frac{5}{3} x
\][/tex]
### Analysis of the Given Work:
1. First Choice: "The work was completed correctly."
- This statement is correct. The provided solution shows the correct steps to isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex] and simplifies both sides properly.
2. Second Choice: "Both sides needed to be multiplied by 3, rather than divided by 3."
- This statement is incorrect. Multiplying both sides by 3 would not isolate [tex]\( y \)[/tex]. We needed to divide both sides by 3 to solve for [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
3. Third Choice: "When dividing 36 by 3, the answer should have been [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex], not 12."
- This statement is incorrect. The correct division of 36 by 3 is indeed 12, not [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex].
4. Fourth Choice: "Both terms on the right side need to be divided by 3, not just the 36."
- This statement is also correct. Both 36 and [tex]\( -5x \)[/tex] were accurately divided by 3 in the original work.
### Conclusion:
- Correct Work Statement: The work was completed correctly.
- Incorrect Work Statements: Both sides needed to be multiplied by 3, rather than divided by 3. When dividing 36 by 3, the answer should have been [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex], not 12. Both terms on the right side need to be divided by 3, not just the 36.
From this analysis, we conclude that the work was done correctly. The correct choice is the first one.
Thanks for taking the time to read Analyze the work used to write an equivalent equation for tex y tex tex 3y 36 5x tex 1 Divide both sides by 3 frac. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada