We appreciate your visit to There is no difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause A True B False. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Final answer:
The statement is false. Reasonable suspicion and probable cause are two different standards of proof in United States law, with the latter requiring a higher level of suspicion.
Explanation:
The statement is false. There is indeed a difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause. In the legal domain, reasonable suspicion refers to a legal standard of proof in United States law that is less than probable cause, which is required to justify a police officer's making a warrantless arrest, or conducting a personal or property search. Probable cause on the other hand is a higher level of suspicion—more than a hunch but less than certain knowledge. It refers to a requirement in the law that must usually exisit before a law enforcement officer can make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant. In short, reasonable suspicion is a lower threshold of proof than probable cause.
Learn more about Reasonable Suspicion versus Probable Cause here:
https://brainly.com/question/30081874
#SPJ1
Thanks for taking the time to read There is no difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause A True B False. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
