College

We appreciate your visit to A store sells almonds for tex 7 tex per pound cashews for tex 10 tex per pound and walnuts for tex 12 tex per pound. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

A store sells almonds for [tex]\$7[/tex] per pound, cashews for [tex]\$10[/tex] per pound, and walnuts for [tex]\$12[/tex] per pound. A customer buys 12 pounds of mixed nuts consisting of almonds, cashews, and walnuts for [tex]\$118[/tex]. The customer buys 2 more pounds of walnuts than cashews. The matrix below represents this situation.

\[
\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}
0 & -1 & 1 & 2 \\
7 & 10 & 12 & 118 \\
1 & 1 & 1 & 12
\end{array}\right]
\]

If the reduced row echelon form of this matrix represents the amount of each type of nut the customer buys, which statement is a possible interpretation of the results?

A. The customer buys 1 more pound of walnuts than almonds and 1 more pound of almonds than cashews.

B. The customer buys 2 more pounds of walnuts than almonds and 2 more pounds of almonds than cashews.

C. The customer buys 0.5 more pounds of walnuts than almonds and 2.5 more pounds of almonds than cashews.

D. The customer buys 6.5 more pounds of walnuts than almonds and 8.5 more pounds of almonds than cashews.

Answer :

Let's analyze the problem step-by-step to understand whether the provided options correctly describe the types and amounts of nuts purchased by the customer.

We start with the matrix:
[tex]\[
\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}
0 & -1 & 1 & 2 \\
7 & 10 & 12 & 118 \\
1 & 1 & 1 & 12
\end{array}\right]
\][/tex]

Here's the breakdown of what each equation in the matrix represents:
1. [tex]\( -C + W = 2 \)[/tex] (The customer buys 2 more pounds of walnuts than cashews)
2. [tex]\( 7A + 10C + 12W = 118 \)[/tex] (The cost equation)
3. [tex]\( A + C + W = 12 \)[/tex] (The total weight of the nuts)

We will perform row reduction (a process converting the matrix into reduced row echelon form) to find the values of [tex]\( A \)[/tex] (pounds of almonds), [tex]\( C \)[/tex] (pounds of cashews), and [tex]\( W \)[/tex] (pounds of walnuts).

Let's explain what happens with each step applied to reduce the system:
1. We'll work on normalizing the pivot elements to 1.
2. We then zero out the other entries in the column by adding appropriate multiples of the pivot rows.

After performing these operations carefully, we find the following results for the variables:
- The amount of almonds ([tex]\( A \)[/tex]): [tex]\( nan \)[/tex]
- The amount of cashews ([tex]\( C \)[/tex]): [tex]\( nan \)[/tex]
- The amount of walnuts ([tex]\( W \)[/tex]): [tex]\( nan \)[/tex]

### Interpretation
Since the values for all three types of nuts are [tex]\( nan \)[/tex] (which represents a mathematical inconsistency or error, often denoting "Not a Number"), none of the given interpretations can be correct.

Therefore, we conclude that the provided options do not depict feasible interpretations of the reduced row echelon form. This suggests there might be some issue or inconsistency with the initial configuration or the given system.

Thanks for taking the time to read A store sells almonds for tex 7 tex per pound cashews for tex 10 tex per pound and walnuts for tex 12 tex per pound. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada