• Law
College

We appreciate your visit to In US vs Carroll the Supreme Court upheld an officer s right to search a vehicle s trunk when the officers have a probable cause. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

In US vs. Carroll, the Supreme Court upheld an officer's right to search a vehicle's trunk when the officers have:

a. probable cause
b. reasonable suspicion
c. no justification
d. permission from the driver

Answer :

Final answer:

The Supreme Court upheld an officer's right to search a vehicle's trunk when they have probable cause, which is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion, and necessary for more invasive searches.

Explanation:

In the case of US vs. Carroll, the Supreme Court upheld an officer's right to search a vehicle's trunk when the officers have probable cause. Probable cause is the legal standard for determining whether a search or seizure is constitutional or a crime has been committed. It is a more stringent requirement than reasonable suspicion, which is only enough to stop and frisk individuals on the street under certain conditions as established in Terry v. Ohio (1968). However, for more invasive searches, such as those of a vehicle's trunk, officers must have probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime is present within the area to be searched.

Thanks for taking the time to read In US vs Carroll the Supreme Court upheld an officer s right to search a vehicle s trunk when the officers have a probable cause. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada