We appreciate your visit to Studies have found that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain McCabe Castel 2008. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Studies have found that "people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; etc" (Beck, 2010). Raymond is a research assistant who claims that brain-imaging data is absolutely objective. Which of the following is the best response to Raymond's claim?

A. His claim is true because brain-imaging data are a direct measure of brain activity.
B. His claim is not true because brain-imaging data are bound by theories of how the data should be interpreted.
C. His claim is true because brain-imaging data capture the neural basis of behavior.

Answer :

Answer:

B. His claim is not true because brain-imaging data are bound by theories of how the data should be interpreted.

Explanation:

Raymond's claim about brain-imaging data is not true. This is because the data gotten and interpreted are actually governed by certain theories. These theories reveal how the data should be interpreted.

Brain-imaging techniques help neuroscientists to see what goes on in the brain. It helps them to detect neurological disorders.

Thanks for taking the time to read Studies have found that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain McCabe Castel 2008. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada