Have criminal convictions and the accompanying sentencing, along with societal reactions to breaches of corporate law and business ethics, created a synergism that punishes the white-collar criminal too harshly?

A) True
B) False

The question concerning whether white-collar criminals are punished too harshly is complex, involving factors like the substantial harm caused by corporate crimes, historical resource imbalances in prosecuting these crimes, and recent trends towards stricter penalties. The correct option is A.

Explanation:

The question asks if criminal convictions and the accompanying sentencing, along with societal reaction to breaches of corporate law and business ethics, have created a synergy that punishes the white-collar criminal too harshly.

While it is true that white-collar crime can cause significant personal and financial harm, surpassing that of conventional crime, efforts to combat these crimes have historically been hampered by factors like resource imbalance and a higher bar for criminal liability for white-collar versus other crimes.

However, the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and subsequent high-profile cases resulting in severe penalties have signaled a shift towards harsher punishment for white-collar criminals. Despite these measures, criticism remains regarding the adequacy and fairness of these responses, especially given the extensive harm that corporate crimes can inflict on society.

Have criminal convictions and the accompanying sentencing, along with societal reactions to breaches of corporate law and business ethics, created a synergism that punishes the white-collar criminal too harshly?A) True B) False

Answer :

Final answer:

Explanation:

Other Questions

Have criminal convictions and the accompanying sentencing, along with societal reactions to breaches of corporate law and business ethics, created a synergism that punishes the white-collar criminal too harshly?

A) True
B) False