How were the Gospels of Charlemagne different from the Ottonian manuscripts?

A. The figures are similar to the Ottonian manuscripts.
B. The figures are full-bodied and wear white robes.
C. The figures are not realistic-looking.
D. None of the above.

The Gospels of Charlemagne were quite distinct from the Ottonian manuscripts in several ways. The Gospels of Charlemagne, produced during the Carolingian Renaissance, aimed to revive the classical naturalism of ancient Rome. This attempt is evident in the classical poses and clothing of the figures in these manuscripts.

The figures in the Gospels of Charlemagne were characterized by three-dimensionality, with attention to naturalistic details, varied poses, gestures, and facial expressions. This style made the figures appear more lifelike and dynamic, contrasting sharply with the often more rigid and less naturalistic figures in Ottonian manuscripts.

For example, in the Coronation Gospels, the evangelists are depicted in classical poses and are often draped in clothing reminiscent of ancient Roman philosophers.

On the other hand, Ottonian manuscripts, such as those produced in the 10th and 11th centuries, often featured figures that were more stylized and less naturalistic. These figures could appear more elongated, rigid, and less three-dimensional compared to those in the Gospels of Charlemagne.

How were the Gospels of Charlemagne different from the Ottonian manuscripts?A. The figures are similar to the Ottonian manuscripts.B. The figures are full-bodied and wear white robes.C. The figures are not realistic-looking.D. None of the above.

Answer :

Other Questions

How were the Gospels of Charlemagne different from the Ottonian manuscripts?

A. The figures are similar to the Ottonian manuscripts.
B. The figures are full-bodied and wear white robes.
C. The figures are not realistic-looking.
D. None of the above.