We appreciate your visit to The U S Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech is not protected when the speech presents A a risk of imminent lawless action. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech is not protected when the speech presents a risk of imminent lawless action. Thus, option A is correct.
What is imminent lawless action test?
The term imminent lawless action test refers to the rulings of Supreme court in the United State which holds that since the constitutional guarantees which is free speech and press freedom, state should not use force except when there is violation.
Infact, it has been says that for speech to be restricted, it must be directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action.
Therefore, The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech is not protected when the speech presents a risk of imminent lawless action. Thus, option A is correct.
Learn more about Supreme Court on:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ1
Thanks for taking the time to read The U S Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech is not protected when the speech presents A a risk of imminent lawless action. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
U.S. Supreme Court rulings have determined that freedom of speech does not protect expressions that risk imminent lawless action, fighting words, or genuine threats. Notable decisions like Brandenburg v. Ohio clarify when speech advocating illegal action becomes unprotected if it incites imminent lawless behavior.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech does not protect expressions presenting a risk of imminent lawless action. Landmark decisions like Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) established the imminent lawless action standard, stating that speech advocating for illegal behavior is protected unless it is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to do so. Other forms of speech that are not protected include "fighting words," genuine threats, and expressions that are obscene or defamatory.
Not Protected Speech
Incitement to imminent lawless action
Fighting words
True threats to individuals or groups
It's important to note that these restrictions are in place to prevent harm and maintain public order, not to suppress freedom of expression per se. Even with these limitations, the Supreme Court has historically protected speech that is offensive, unpopular, or critical of the government, upholding the First Amendment rights until it crosses the line into direct incitement of illegal activity.
