According to the case "To Lock or Unlock Your Phone: Personal Privacy or National Security," an argument in support of preventing government access to private cell phones is that it safeguards individual privacy and protects against potential abuse of power by authorities.

A. True
B. False

The statement is true. The main argument to prevent government access to private cell phones is the importance of individual privacy and the risk of authority's abuse of power.

Explanation:

The statement is indeed True. One of the primary arguments for preventing government access to private cell phones, as depicted in the case 'To Lock or Unlock Your Phone: Personal Privacy or National Security,' is to safeguard individual privacy and to protect against any potential abuse of power by the authorities. Granting authorities unrestrained access to private communications could lead to misuse of information and ultimately, breach of an individual’s privacy rights. And by protecting cell phone data, personal information remains private, ensuring that citizens maintain their constitutional right to privacy.

Learn more about Privacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/14603023

#SPJ11

According to the case "To Lock or Unlock Your Phone: Personal Privacy or National Security," an argument in support of preventing government access to private cell phones is that it safeguards individual privacy and protects against potential abuse of power by authorities.A. True B. False

Answer :

Final answer:

Explanation:

Learn more about Privacy here:

Other Questions

According to the case "To Lock or Unlock Your Phone: Personal Privacy or National Security," an argument in support of preventing government access to private cell phones is that it safeguards individual privacy and protects against potential abuse of power by authorities.

A. True
B. False