We appreciate your visit to A justice writes this when he or she agrees with the majority opinion but for a different reason A Brief B Per curiam opinion C. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Final answer:
A justice who agrees with the majority's decision but for different reasons writes a concurring opinion. It's an individual justice's interpretation that can influence future law, separate from the majority or dissenting opinions.
Explanation:
When a justice agrees with the majority of the Supreme Court in the outcome of a case but has different reasoning, this is captured in a document known as a concurring opinion. This is distinct from the majority opinion, which represents the main reasoning of the Court, and the dissenting opinion, written by justices who disagree with the majority's conclusion. A concurring opinion is valuable as it may influence future legal thinking and case law, even if it does not represent the principal rationale of the Court's decision.
Thanks for taking the time to read A justice writes this when he or she agrees with the majority opinion but for a different reason A Brief B Per curiam opinion C. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
