How were the Gospels of Charlemagne different from the Ottonian manuscripts?

A. The figures are similar to the Ottonian manuscripts.
B. The figures are full-bodied and wear white robes.
C. The figures are not realistic looking.
D. None of the above.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided.

The Gospels of Charlemagne differ from the Ottonian manuscripts primarily in their stylization, featuring figures that are less realistic and more abstract in nature. While Ottonian manuscripts emphasize realism and intricate details, the Carolingian style favors a formal presentation. Thus, option c is the best answer as it reflects this key difference.

Explanation:

Differences between the Gospels of Charlemagne and Ottonian Manuscripts

The Gospels of Charlemagne, also known as the Carolingian Gospels, are distinguished from the Ottonian manuscripts in several artistic ways. One notable difference lies in the depiction of figures, specifically in terms of realism and style.

Here are the main contrasts:

The figures in the Gospels of Charlemagne tend to be less realistic, often appearing more stylized compared to the Ottonian manuscripts, where figures are portrayed with more attention to naturalism.
Unlike OTtonian art, which often incorporated a variety of detailed patterns and realistic elements, the Carolingian style is marked by its more formal and less individualistic approach.
In the Gospels of Charlemagne, figures are frequently depicted without a focus on body proportions that reflect real human anatomy, leading to their more abstract representation.

Considering the options provided in your question, the most accurate answer would be:c. the figures are not realistic looking.

Learn more about Artistic Differences in Manuscripts here:

https://brainly.com/question/2415816