Killing in self-defense or in the defense of another person, if the victim's actions and capability present imminent danger of serious injury or death, is referred to as _____.

Question

14-09-2025
Law

College

We appreciate your visit to Killing in self defense or in the defense of another person if the victim s actions and capability present imminent danger of serious injury or. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Killing in self-defense or in the defense of another person, if the victim's actions and capability present imminent danger of serious injury or death, is referred to as _____.

Answer :

Other Questions

What is the value of a coin called a widow's mite?

How many minutes are there in a week, if a week has

A town is using water from a reservoir that is being refilled

Si el kilo de frijol cuesta 18.20 pesos, ¿cuánto debo pagar por

4. A rectangular bar, 75mm wide by 50mm thick, extends 2mm on

What is the difference between a personal health record and a patient

The ICD-10 code M54.50 indicates that the patient has neck pain. It

Examples of the effects of abuse include: a. depression and low self-esteem.

Use the table and image to answer the question. Price in Dollars

4.4.1 Name ONE method that could be used by stock owners to

MithunS MithunS · Answer 1 · 2025-05-08T06:01:54-04:00

Final answer:

killing in self-defence or in the defence of another person if the victim's actions and capability present imminent danger of serious injury or death is referred to as justifiable homicide.

Explanation:

Justifiable murder is the term used to describe killing committed in self-defence or in defence of another person if the victim's actions and capabilities offer an immediate risk of serious damage or death. This concept is a legal defense in criminal law, recognizing the right of an individual to protect oneself or others against threats or perceived threats of death or grievous bodily harm.

The moral and legal implications of lethal self-defence have been extensively debated, reflecting on the balance between individual rights to safety and the value of human life. Historical arguments, such as those by Adams, highlight the long-standing recognition of self-defence in law, where it is lawful to kill in one's own defence under certain circumstances.

Meanwhile, in discussing broader implications, the scenario where a tribe exacts retribution on any member of a rival tribe, rather than the specific killer, showcases an early form of collective responsibility but does not necessarily fit within the accepted legal definition of self-defence.