We appreciate your visit to 9 Which expressions are equivalent to tex 8 9x 6 2 8 7 tex Check all that apply tex 9x 6 9 tex tex 8. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
To determine which expressions are equivalent to [tex]\(8.9x + 6.2 + 8.7\)[/tex], we need to check if rearranging or grouping the terms results in the same expression. Let's go through each option to see which ones are equivalent:
1. [tex]\(9x + 6 + 9\)[/tex]: This expression changes both the coefficients and the constants, so it is not equivalent.
2. [tex]\(8.9 + 6.2 + 8.7x\)[/tex]: Here, the term involving [tex]\(x\)[/tex] has been moved, but the coefficients of the constants and the [tex]\(x\)[/tex] term differ, so it's not equivalent.
3. [tex]\(8.9x + 8.7 + 6.2\)[/tex]: This expression simply reorders the addition of constants and the term with [tex]\(x\)[/tex]. Since addition is commutative, this is equivalent to the original expression.
4. [tex]\(8.7 + 8.9x + 6.2\)[/tex]: Similar to option 3, this expression changes the order of terms but remains equivalent to the original due to the commutative property of addition.
5. [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9\)[/tex]: This expression lacks the [tex]\(x\)[/tex] term, so it is not equivalent.
6. [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9x\)[/tex]: Reordering the terms without changing their structure makes this equivalent to the original expression.
7. [tex]\((8.7 + 8.9x) + 6.2\)[/tex]: The order of operations is altered with parentheses, but since they only affect the grouping and not the value, this expression is also equivalent.
Based on the above analysis, the expressions equivalent to [tex]\(8.9x + 6.2 + 8.7\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]\(8.9x + 8.7 + 6.2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(8.7 + 8.9x + 6.2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9x\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((8.7 + 8.9x) + 6.2\)[/tex]
Thus, the equivalent expressions are options 3, 4, 6, and 7.
1. [tex]\(9x + 6 + 9\)[/tex]: This expression changes both the coefficients and the constants, so it is not equivalent.
2. [tex]\(8.9 + 6.2 + 8.7x\)[/tex]: Here, the term involving [tex]\(x\)[/tex] has been moved, but the coefficients of the constants and the [tex]\(x\)[/tex] term differ, so it's not equivalent.
3. [tex]\(8.9x + 8.7 + 6.2\)[/tex]: This expression simply reorders the addition of constants and the term with [tex]\(x\)[/tex]. Since addition is commutative, this is equivalent to the original expression.
4. [tex]\(8.7 + 8.9x + 6.2\)[/tex]: Similar to option 3, this expression changes the order of terms but remains equivalent to the original due to the commutative property of addition.
5. [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9\)[/tex]: This expression lacks the [tex]\(x\)[/tex] term, so it is not equivalent.
6. [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9x\)[/tex]: Reordering the terms without changing their structure makes this equivalent to the original expression.
7. [tex]\((8.7 + 8.9x) + 6.2\)[/tex]: The order of operations is altered with parentheses, but since they only affect the grouping and not the value, this expression is also equivalent.
Based on the above analysis, the expressions equivalent to [tex]\(8.9x + 6.2 + 8.7\)[/tex] are:
- [tex]\(8.9x + 8.7 + 6.2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(8.7 + 8.9x + 6.2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(6.2 + 8.7 + 8.9x\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((8.7 + 8.9x) + 6.2\)[/tex]
Thus, the equivalent expressions are options 3, 4, 6, and 7.
Thanks for taking the time to read 9 Which expressions are equivalent to tex 8 9x 6 2 8 7 tex Check all that apply tex 9x 6 9 tex tex 8. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
