College

We appreciate your visit to True or False When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and reasoning of the majority opinion but also disagrees with the dissenting opinion she. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

True or False:

When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and reasoning of the majority opinion, but also disagrees with the dissenting opinion, she may write an abstaining opinion.

Answer :

The statement "When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and with the reasoning of the majority opinion, but disagrees with the dissenting opinion as well, she may write and abstaining opinion" is False

False, when an appellate judge disagrees with both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion, she may write a concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion, not an abstaining opinion.

The judge does this to express her unique perspective on the case that is not fully represented by the majority or dissenting opinions.

An abstaining opinion is not a recognized form of judicial opinion in U.S. law.

Therefore, the claim that a judge would write an 'abstaining opinion' in this case is False.

Learn more about Judicial Opinions here:

https://brainly.com/question/32900797

#SPJ11

Thanks for taking the time to read True or False When an appellate judge disagrees with the result and reasoning of the majority opinion but also disagrees with the dissenting opinion she. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada