• Law
College

We appreciate your visit to Sydney works for a cleared defense contractor and has access to classified information She goes on a podcast to discuss her job and references some. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Sydney works for a cleared defense contractor and has access to classified information. She goes on a podcast to discuss her job and references some of the classified information with which she works. What type of unauthorized disclosure has occurred? (Select the best answer)

A. Public domain
B. Spillage
C. Espionage
D. Improper safeguarding

Answer :

Final answer:

Sydney's disclosure of classified information on a podcast is best categorized as espionage, as it involves sharing sensitive data without authorization. Spillage and improper safeguarding do not apply here, as her actions were intentional. Thus, the main type of unauthorized disclosure that occurred is espionage.


Explanation:

Unauthorized Disclosure in Classified Context

In the scenario described, Sydney has disclosed information that she accessed during her work with a cleared defense contractor. Unauthorized disclosure of classified information can be categorized in various ways depending on the nature and intent of the disclosure.

The best answer to the question is espionage. Espionage involves the unauthorized sharing of sensitive and classified information with the intent of aiding an adversary or harming national security. While journalists and researchers may discuss classified topics in a more general sense, when it includes specific details from classified sources, it constitutes a serious violation of security protocols.

Spillage refers to the accidental release of classified information, which does not apply here since Sydney's actions seem intentional. Similarly, improper safeguarding involves taking inadequate precautions to protect classified information but does not pertain directly to her speaking out about the information on a podcast. Finally, public domain implies that the information is already available to the public, which it is not in this case.

Conclusion

Sydney's actions demonstrate a clear case of espionage as she shared specific classified information without proper authorization.


Learn more about Unauthorized Disclosure here:

https://brainly.com/question/30154544


Thanks for taking the time to read Sydney works for a cleared defense contractor and has access to classified information She goes on a podcast to discuss her job and references some. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

Answer:

Explanation:

Espionage is not the correct answer.