• Law
College

We appreciate your visit to The U S Supreme Court ruled that efforts to ban indecent and obscene material on the Web through the Communications Decency Act of 1996 were. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that efforts to ban indecent and obscene material on the Web through the Communications Decency Act of 1996 were unconstitutional.

A. True
B. False

Answer :

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that efforts to ban indecent and obscene material on the Web through the Communications Decency Act of 1996 were unconstitutional. a. true.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that efforts to ban indecent and obscene material on the Web through the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) were unconstitutional. In 1997, the Supreme Court case Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) determined that key provisions of the CDA violated the First Amendment's protection of free speech. The ruling stated that the Internet should receive the highest level of First Amendment protection, and that regulations on speech in this medium must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. The Supreme Court's decision effectively struck down the CDA's provisions related to regulating indecent and obscene material on the Internet.

To know more about Communications Decency Act of 1996

https://brainly.com/question/31026816

#SPJ11

Thanks for taking the time to read The U S Supreme Court ruled that efforts to ban indecent and obscene material on the Web through the Communications Decency Act of 1996 were. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada