We appreciate your visit to A Supreme Court justice agrees with the outcome of a case but disagrees with the legal reasoning presented in the majority opinion Which of the. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Final answer:
A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the outcome of a case but disagrees with the legal reasoning of the majority can write a concurring opinion, providing their own rationale for the decision.
Explanation:
If a Supreme Court justice agrees with the outcome of a case but disagrees with the legal reasoning of the majority, they can write a concurring opinion. In a concurring opinion, the justice agrees with the overall outcome of the case, but they provide their own legal rationale for reaching that decision. This is different from the majority opinion which is the official legal reasoning for the court's decision, and from the dissenting opinion, where a justice disagrees with both the outcome of the case and the legal reasoning.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/32059914
#SPJ11
Thanks for taking the time to read A Supreme Court justice agrees with the outcome of a case but disagrees with the legal reasoning presented in the majority opinion Which of the. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
