Answer :

Final answer:

A unicameral legislature has one decision-making body which makes the legislative process more efficient, but lacks check and balances. On the other hand, a bicameral legislature has two decision-making bodies which allows for different perspectives and introduces a system of checks and balances, but can result in legislative gridlock.

Explanation:

A unicameral legislature differs from a bicameral legislature in that it only has one chamber or body that makes decisions, whereas a bicameral legislature has two separate chambers that must work cooperatively to make policy and carry out other legislative powers and responsibilities.

One of the main strengths of a unicameral legislature is its ability to create a more efficient legislative process as bills only need to go before and be debated by one set of decision makers. However, this system does not provide opportunities for oversight and checks on the power of the legislature.

In contrast, a bicameral system, allows for different perspectives - for example, one chamber may reflect the perspective of the general population, while the other may represent different territories or classes. This creates a system of checks and balances within the legislative branch. However, a key weakness of a bicameral system is that it can result in legislative gridlock due to disagreements between the two chambers.

Learn more about Unicameral and Bicameral Legislature here:

https://brainly.com/question/33872528

#SPJ11

Thanks for taking the time to read How does a unicameral legislature differ from a bicameral legislature. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada