High School

We appreciate your visit to Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them Consider for instance some comfortable English professor defending. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them. Consider, for instance, some comfortable English professor defending Russian totalitarianism. He cannot say outright, “I believe in killing off your opponents when you can get good results by doing so.” Probably, therefore, he will say something like this:

"While freely conceding that the Soviet regime exhibits certain features which the humanitarian may be inclined to deplore, we must, I think, agree that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of transitional periods, and that the rigors which the Russian people have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement."

– “Politics and the English Language,”
George Orwell

How does the evidence support the claim that "political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible"?

A. It presents statistics that prove that language is often used to defend the indefensible.
B. It gives an example of how language helps people reveal the truth.
C. It provides a hypothetical example of how someone can use language to hide terrible acts.
D. It uses a quotation from an expert to show how language can be used to defend immoral acts.

Answer :

The evidence that supports the claim that "political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible" is the hypothetical example provided by George Orwell in the given passage.

What is the evidence provided by George Orwell that supports the claim that "political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible"?

The evidence that supports the claim that "political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible" is the hypothetical example provided by George Orwell in the given passage. Orwell describes how language is often used to hide terrible acts and present them in a more acceptable light, as in the case of a professor defending Russian totalitarianism.

The professor cannot openly express his support for killing opponents, so he uses language to present the atrocities in a more favorable manner. This example demonstrates how political speech and writing can be used to defend immoral acts and ideas. Therefore, the correct answer is: It provides a hypothetical example of how someone can use language to hide terrible acts.

To learn more about political speech follow the given link: https://brainly.com/question/22747181

#SPJ1

Thanks for taking the time to read Such phraseology is needed if one wants to name things without calling up mental pictures of them Consider for instance some comfortable English professor defending. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

Answer:

its c. "It provides a hypothetical example of how someone can use language to hide terrible acts."

Explanation:

i js got it right