What was the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro?

Question

22-03-2024
Social Studies

High School

We appreciate your visit to What was the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

What was the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro?

Answer :

Other Questions

Plane P contains four distinct lines: L1, L2, L3, and L4. Suppose

A compound with the molecular formula C\(_5\)H\(_{10}\)O\(_2\) has the following \(^1\)H NMR

What formula would produce the value in Cell C25? [tex] \[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|}

If [tex]C_1 = C_2 = 4.00 \, \mu F[/tex] and [tex]C_4 =

Find the mode of the following set of numbers: 65, 65, 71,

The points C, D, E, and F all lie on the same

What was the most likely change in depositional environment that occurred from

A factory can make 900 pencils in 6 minutes. How many pencils

¿Qué es el esquema corporal? Seleccione una opción: A. La estructura ósea

Hermit crabs have a soft belly and live in the ocean. To

professorenglish94 professorenglish94 · Answer 1 · 2024-05-21T13:02:25-04:00

Final Answer:

The application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the case Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro concerned allegations of genocide committed during the Bosnian War. Bosnia and Herzegovina accused Serbia and Montenegro of genocide, seeking to hold them accountable for acts of genocide and other violations of international law.

Explanation:

The case Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro was brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, in 1993. Bosnia and Herzegovina alleged that Serbia and Montenegro, as well as their agents and proxies, had committed acts of genocide during the Bosnian War (1992-1995). The application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was central to the case, as it provided the legal framework for determining whether acts of genocide had occurred and for holding the accused parties accountable.

The ICJ's judgment in the case, delivered in 2007, found that Serbia had violated its obligation under the Genocide Convention to prevent genocide in Srebrenica but did not find Serbia guilty of committing genocide through its own actions. However, the Court did conclude that Serbia had violated international law by failing to prevent genocide and by not cooperating fully with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The ruling highlighted the importance of the Genocide Convention in holding states accountable for acts of genocide and reaffirmed the international community's commitment to preventing and punishing such heinous crimes.