We appreciate your visit to When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision of the majority of the members he she may write a A Concurring opinion B Dissenting. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
A Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority may write a dissenting opinion, while one who agrees with the outcome but not the reasoning may write a concurring opinion, option B is correct.
When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision of the majority of the members, he or she may write a dissenting opinion. This expresses why they disagreed with the majority's reasoning and decision. Justices who agree with the outcome but not the reasoning may write a concurring opinion, providing their own reasons for agreeing with the judgment. Dissenting opinions are significant; they show the decision-making process and can influence future cases and possibly overturn precedent.
Thanks for taking the time to read When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision of the majority of the members he she may write a A Concurring opinion B Dissenting. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
