Answer :

If Starbucks had accrued a $3,700 million litigation liability and expense, it would have negatively impacted its Return on Equity (ROE).

ROE is a financial metric that measures a company's profitability by comparing its net income to its shareholder's equity. The litigation liability and expense would have reduced Starbucks' net income, resulting in a lower ROE. To calculate the adjusted ROE, we need to subtract the litigation liability and expense from the net income and then divide it by the average shareholder's equity.

It is important to note that without knowing the specific figures for net income and shareholder's equity, it is not possible to determine the exact impact on Starbucks' ROE. However, it can be inferred that the ROE would have decreased due to the additional liability and expense.

To know more about Return on Equity visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/32974927

#SPJ11

Thanks for taking the time to read g what would starbucks roe have been if it had accrued a 3700 million litigation liablity and expense. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada