How does NFC help defy voter suppression?

Question

10-10-2025
Social Studies

High School

We appreciate your visit to How does NFC help defy voter suppression. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

How does NFC help defy voter suppression?

Answer :

Other Questions

2. Correct the sentences where it is necessary.a) Linda was busy when

Find the volume of the composite solid. Round your answer to the

hree children are riding on the edge of a merry-go-round that is

if a violin string vibrates at 266 hz as its fundamental frequency,

The clocks shows the time that Kim left the library in the

The ratio of the perimeter of square RSTU to the perimeter of

A client weighs 176 lbs. How many grams of protein should the

What is the product of the expression? [tex]\left(-2x - 9y^2\right)(-4x - 3)[/tex]

After a blizzard, Zeke shovels snow from the sidewalk in front of

Select the correct answer. Read the passage and answer the question that

packiarajse95 packiarajse95 · Answer 1 · 2024-08-01T14:21:57-04:00

Final answer:

Voter suppression encompasses a range of tactics aimed at disenfranchising certain voter demographics in the U.S., with strict voter ID laws and reduced voting accessibility being some examples. These practices have been criticized for targeting minority and low-income voters while combating a nearly non-existent issue of voter fraud.

Explanation:

The issue of voter suppression is a significant concern in the United States, where various tactics are utilized to disenfranchise certain groups of voters, particularly minorities and the economically disadvantaged. Practices such as the enactment of strict voter ID laws, cutting down on early voting opportunities, and the elimination of same-day registration are seen as barriers that could deter eligible voters from participating in elections. Particularly controversial are the laws that have emerged post-2013, following the Supreme Court's decision to roll back provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which allowed states to implement voter identification laws without federal approval.

Of particular note are instances in states like Georgia and Texas, where voters faced challenges such as long wait times and reduced voting station access, respectively. Critics argue that these laws address a virtually non-existent issue of voter fraud, citing Department of Justice statistics, while disproportionately affecting groups that might typically vote against the suppressing party's interests.