High School

We appreciate your visit to The researchers who conducted the Stanford prison simulation believed that the participants designated as guards acted harshly toward those designated as prisoners because the. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

The researchers who conducted the Stanford prison simulation believed that the participants designated as guards acted harshly toward those designated as prisoners because the _______?

Answer :

The researchers who conducted the Stanford prison simulation believed that the participants designated as guards acted harshly toward those designated as prisoners because of the power of role playing and power of situation.

The Stanford Prison Experiment, according to Zimbardo and his associates, demonstrated how people effortlessly adhere to the social roles they are expected to perform, particularly when those roles are as highly stereotyped as the responsibilities of prison guards.

According to a recent assessment, the classic Stanford Jail Experiment from 1971, in which unremarkable college students were put in a mimic prison and suddenly changed into hostile guards and frantic captives, was seriously faulty.

To learn more about Stanford prison simulation, refer

https://brainly.com/question/27378178

#SPJ4

Thanks for taking the time to read The researchers who conducted the Stanford prison simulation believed that the participants designated as guards acted harshly toward those designated as prisoners because the. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

Final answer:

The Stanford Prison Simulation was an experiment that demonstrated the power of social roles and expectations on influencing human behavior. Participants designated as 'guards' began to act in a harsh manner towards 'prisoners', exhibiting behavior that was completely inconsistent with their typical behavior. This experiment highlights how people can conform to roles and norms, even when it means behaving contrary to their own personal beliefs.

Explanation:

The researchers who conducted the Stanford Prison Simulation believed that the participants designated as 'guards' acted harshly toward those designated as 'prisoners' because of the power dynamics inherent in the roles they were playing. Social roles, norms, and scripts were found to have an incredible influence on human behavior, even to the point where those acting as guards began to behave in sadistic manners towards the 'prisoners'.

The experiment also demonstrated how people can adhere to the roles they are expected to play, to the point of acting contrary to their own personal beliefs or instincts. Researchers Philip Zimbardo and his team set up a mock prison, and soon the ‘guards' began to harass the prisoners harshly. This behavior escalated over time, despite all the participants knowing that this was just an experiment.

Despite the harsh conditions, none of the guards quit the experiment, none came late for their shifts neither demanded extra pay. A significant conclusion from this experiment was that people can behave in ways that are completely out of character when put in certain situations or given certain roles, an insight that has profound implications for understanding human behavior in the real world.

Learn more about Stanford Prison Experiment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29534348

#SPJ3