What is an advantage of using a text editor instead of an integrated development environment (IDE)?

1. Text editors are lightweight and consume less memory compared to IDEs.
2. Text editors provide a simpler and more focused environment for writing code.
3. Text editors are more customizable and allow for greater flexibility in workflow.
4. Text editors are generally free and open-source, while IDEs often require a paid license.

Text editors offer the advantage of being lightweight, customizable, and often free, providing an efficient and cost-effective option for programmers compared to more resource-intensive IDEs. Therefore, The correct option is 1) Text editors are lightweight and consume less memory compared to IDEs.

Explanation:

An advantage of using a text editor over an integrated development environment (IDE) is that text editors tend to be lightweight and less memory-intensive. This makes them ideal for systems with limited resources or for developers who prefer simplicity and nimbleness. Text editors like Emacs, vim, and Notepad++ offer core functionalities that are essential for writing and editing code, such as syntax highlighting and searching and replacing text. These editors are often open source and free, offering a cost-effective alternative to paid IDEs. Moreover, they allow for extensive customization, enabling programmers to tailor their workspace to fit their needs and preferences. As an example, with Emacs, users can not only edit the text but also compile and debug code within the editor itself, exhibiting that some text editors can approach the capabilities of an IDE while still maintaining their flexibility and efficiency.