High School

We appreciate your visit to The case of Mapp v Ohio did what A Required police to inform suspects of their right to remain silent B Imposed the federal exclusionary. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

The case of Mapp v. Ohio did what?

A. Required police to inform suspects of their right to remain silent
B. Imposed the federal exclusionary rule onto the state courts
C. Required police to advise suspects of their right to demand a search warrant
D. Imposed the federal implications rule onto state courts
E. None of the above; Mapp v. Ohio was a free speech case

Answer :

Final answer:

Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through illegal searches is inadmissible in state courts, thus extending the federal exclusionary rule to states. This case was crucial in protecting individual rights against unlawful government actions. It marked a significant expansion of the Fourth Amendment's protections.


Explanation:

Mapp v. Ohio: Overview

The case of Mapp v. Ohio, decided in 1961, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It primarily addressed the issue of illegal searches and seizures conducted by state authorities.

Key Outcomes

In this case, the Court held that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts, thereby imposing the federal exclusionary rule onto state courts. This was significant as it extended the protections of the Fourth Amendment—which previously applied only to federal prosecutions—to state prosecutions, ensuring that all levels of government are held to the same standard regarding evidence collection.

Importance of the Decision

This ruling reinforced individual rights and protection against governmental overreach, solidifying the principle that individuals have the right to privacy. The decision emphasized that illegally obtained evidence cannot be used to convict someone in court, which has become a cornerstone of American law.


Learn more about exclusionary rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/12239906


Thanks for taking the time to read The case of Mapp v Ohio did what A Required police to inform suspects of their right to remain silent B Imposed the federal exclusionary. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada