We appreciate your visit to When the Supreme Court rules on a case how many opinions might be written to explain the verdict A One the majority opinion B Two. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Answer:
Explanation:
D. nine: all justices can write opinions that can be cited in future cases but only majority opinions are considered law
Thanks for taking the time to read When the Supreme Court rules on a case how many opinions might be written to explain the verdict A One the majority opinion B Two. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
The correct answer here is "all justices can write opinions that can be cited in future cases but only majority opinions are considered law."
Usually, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will pick one judge to write the majority opinion. However, each judge does have the ability to share their opinion. If a justice agrees with the majority decision and wants to write about a different reason why they agree, they can. If a justice disagrees with the majority decision they can explain why in a dissent. This really depends on the case at hand.
Usually, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will pick one judge to write the majority opinion. However, each judge does have the ability to share their opinion. If a justice agrees with the majority decision and wants to write about a different reason why they agree, they can. If a justice disagrees with the majority decision they can explain why in a dissent. This really depends on the case at hand.
