High School

We appreciate your visit to In 1969 the Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger doctrine so that public advocacy may be prohibited only in situations when there is. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

In _______________ (1969), the Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger doctrine so that public advocacy may be prohibited only in situations when there is imminent lawless action.

A. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
B. Cohen v. California
C. Flast v. Cohen
D. Brandenburg v. Ohio

Answer :

Final answer:

In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger doctrine, allowing public advocacy to be prohibited only in situations involving imminent lawless action.

Explanation:

In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger doctrine, stating that public advocacy may be prohibited only when there is a likelihood of imminent lawless action. The case involved the prosecution of a Ku Klux Klan leader, Clarence Brandenburg, who made inflammatory statements during a rally. The Court ruled that his speech was protected under the First Amendment because it did not incite immediate violence.

Learn more about Supreme Court case of Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

https://brainly.com/question/11042028

#SPJ4

Thanks for taking the time to read In 1969 the Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger doctrine so that public advocacy may be prohibited only in situations when there is. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada