• Law
High School

We appreciate your visit to A justice that agrees with the majority opinion but for different reasons may write a A differing opinion B concurrent opinion C dissenting opinion D. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

A justice that agrees with the majority opinion but for different reasons may write a:

A. differing opinion.
B. concurrent opinion.
C. dissenting opinion.
D. circulatory opinion.

Answer :

Final answer:

A concurring opinion agrees with the majority but for different reasons, and a dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority decision.


Explanation:

A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court's majority opinion but has different reasons for doing so. It allows the justice to provide additional insights or perspectives on the case despite agreeing with the outcome.


For example, if the majority opinion upholds a law based on constitutional grounds, a justice writing a concurring opinion might agree with the decision but base their support on a different legal theory or interpretation.


In contrast, a dissenting opinion is when a justice disagrees with the majority decision and explains their rationale for opposing it, which can influence future legal interpretations and decisions.


Learn more about Concurring and Dissenting Opinions in Legal System here:

https://brainly.com/question/41604972


Thanks for taking the time to read A justice that agrees with the majority opinion but for different reasons may write a A differing opinion B concurrent opinion C dissenting opinion D. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada