Did the Platt Amendment and American actions in Cuba violate the spirit of the ostensible reasons that the United States went to war? Explain.

Question

28-03-2024
History

High School

We appreciate your visit to Did the Platt Amendment and American actions in Cuba violate the spirit of the ostensible reasons that the United States went to war Explain. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Did the Platt Amendment and American actions in Cuba violate the spirit of the ostensible reasons that the United States went to war? Explain.

Answer :

Other Questions

Provide the necessary entry when a credit amount is entered. If no

A car of mass 800 kg is traveling at 30 m/s. The

At a school carnival, the diameter of the mat of a trampoline

Convert the temperature from degrees Fahrenheit to degrees Celsius using the function:

Mike works a total of 57 hours per week at his two

The CPU of a movie streaming server has an L1 cache reference

The "Ode to Joy" is the finale of Beethoven’s: A. Symphony No.

Which of the following laws regulate wiretapping on a federal level? A.

Describe the main features of the Alliance System that existed in Europe

Which of the following scenarios most clearly exemplifies the successful use of

AntonHugh AntonHugh · Answer 1 · 2024-03-03T18:54:10-05:00

Final answer:

The Platt Amendment contradicted the spirit of the Teller Amendment and the ostensible altruistic reasons for the United States' intervention in Cuba by giving the U.S. control over much of Cuba's foreign policy and a lease for Guantanamo Bay.

Explanation:

The Platt Amendment was legislation from 1901 that significantly altered the earlier Teller Amendment. This new amendment gave the United States substantial control over Cuba's foreign policy and military alliances post the Spanish-American War. The Teller Amendment, which was part of the declaration of war against Spain, explicitly stated that the United States could not annex Cuba and was included to allay fears of American imperialism. However, the Platt Amendment seemed to contradict this by allowing the United States to intervene in Cuban affairs and requiring Cuba to lease Guantanamo Bay for a naval base, which suggested more of an imperialist approach than one simply defending Cuban independence.

Initially, the goal of the American intervention in Cuba was characterized by a desire to assist Cubans in their struggle for independence from Spain, an endeavor epitomized by the Teller Amendment's promise. Yet, the comprehensive powers granted to the U.S. by the Platt Amendment indicate that the U.S. actions in Cuba, following the Spanish-American War, did conflict with the spirit of the Teller Amendment. The provisions of the Platt Amendment overshadows the ostensible altruistic intentions, exposing the United States' own strategic interests in Cuba and the broader Caribbean region.