Answer :

To create propaganda for the 13 colonies and also to portray the British as the ones at fault when in reality it was both British and the colonists that were protesting. Also, the Boston "Massacre" wasn't a massacre at all. A massacre is when a large group of people are murdered, but only 5 were killed in the Boston Massacre. Hope this helps :D

Thanks for taking the time to read Why did Paul Revere misrepresent what happened during the Boston Massacre. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

There are several possible reasons why Paul Revere's depiction of the Boston Massacre may have misrepresented what actually happened.

One reason could be a deliberate attempt to inflame anti-British sentiment and rally support for the American Revolution.

Revere, as a patriot and propagandist, may have exaggerated or distorted the events to create a more compelling narrative that portrayed British soldiers as ruthless aggressors.

Additionally, the chaos and confusion of the event itself, combined with the intense emotions surrounding it, could have led to a distorted recollection of the details.

Revere's account, created through the lens of his own perspective and biases, may have unintentionally diverged from an objective retelling of the incident.

Thus, Paul Revere misrepresented what happened during the Boston Massacre in order to create a national consensus against the British.

Learn more about Paul Revere here:

https://brainly.com/question/20761971

#SPJ6