Middle School

We appreciate your visit to Which option best completes the diagram 1 A disgruntled employee lies about his boss in a newspaper article 2 A judge agrees and rules that. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

Which option best completes the diagram?

1. A disgruntled employee lies about his boss in a newspaper article.
2. A judge agrees and rules that the newspaper article is not protected speech.

A. The employee argues that the article is commercial speech.
B. The boss argues that the article is symbolic speech.
C. The boss argues that the article is libel.
D. The employee argues that the article is free expression.

Answer :

Final answer:

"C" can be considered as the suitable option. The boss argues that the article is libel.' This is due to the definition and nature of libel, which refers to false and damaging statements made about a person.

Explanation:

The correct option to complete this diagram is C. The boss argues that the article is libel. This is because libel involves making false statements that damage a person's reputation. In this case, the disgruntled employee has made false comments about his boss in a newspaper, thus potentially damaging the boss's reputation. Hence, the boss would argue that these statements constitute libel, a form of defamatory speech that is not protected under free speech laws.

Learn more about Libel here:

https://brainly.com/question/32534703

#SPJ5

Thanks for taking the time to read Which option best completes the diagram 1 A disgruntled employee lies about his boss in a newspaper article 2 A judge agrees and rules that. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Since the employee was upset and lying it was likely the lie in the newspaper was defamation