College

We appreciate your visit to The following data lists the ages of a random selection of actresses when they won an award in the category of Best Actress along with. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!

The following data lists the ages of a random selection of actresses when they won an award in the category of Best Actress, along with the ages of actors when they won in the category of Best Actor. The ages are matched according to the year that the awards were presented. Complete parts (a) and (b) below.

Actress (years): 26, 27, 34, 26, 35, 29, 23, 42, 30, 34
Actor (years): 58, 41, 36, 36, 34, 33, 48, 37, 37, 43

a. Use the sample data with a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that for the population of ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors, the differences have a mean less than 0 (indicating that the Best Actresses are generally younger than Best Actors). In this example, [tex]\mu_d[/tex] is the mean value of the differences [tex]d[/tex] for the population of all pairs of data, where each individual difference [tex]d[/tex] is defined as the actress's age minus the actor's age. What are the null and alternative hypotheses for the hypothesis test?

b. Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part (a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)?

Answer :

Answer:

a) [tex]p_v =P(t_{(9)}<-2.679) =0.0126[/tex]

The p value is higher than the significance level given 0.01, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And we can say that the true difference for Best Actresses is not significantly lower than the mean for Best​ Actors at 1% of significance.

b) The 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

c) We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

Let put some notation

x=actor's age , y = actress's age

x: 58 41 36 36 34 33 48 37 37 43

y: 26 27 34 26 35 29 23 42 30 34

The system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_y- \mu_x \geq 0[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_y -\mu_x <0[/tex]

The first step is calculate the difference [tex]d_i=y_i-x_i[/tex] and we obtain this:

d: -32, -14, -2, -10, 1, -4, -25, 5, -7, -9

The second step is calculate the mean difference

[tex]\bar d= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n d_i}{n}= -9.7[/tex]

The third step would be calculate the standard deviation for the differences, and we got:

[tex]s_d =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (d_i -\bar d)^2}{n-1} =11.451[/tex]

The 4 step is calculate the statistic given by :

[tex]t=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{-9.7 -0}{\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}}=-2.679[/tex]

The next step is calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

[tex]df=n-1=10-1=9[/tex]

Now we can calculate the p value, since we have a left tailed test the p value is given by:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{(9)}<-2.679) =0.0126[/tex]

The p value is higher than the significance level given 0.01, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And we can say that the true difference for Best Actresses is not significantly lower than the mean for Best​ Actors at 1% of significance.

Part b

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

[tex]\bar d \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex] (1)

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of [tex]\alpha=0.01[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.005[/tex], and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,9)".And we see that [tex]t_{\alpha/2}=3.25[/tex]

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):

[tex]-9.7-3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=-21.469[/tex]

[tex]-9.7+3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=2.069[/tex]

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

Part c

We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two means is 0.

Thanks for taking the time to read The following data lists the ages of a random selection of actresses when they won an award in the category of Best Actress along with. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada

Final answer:

The null hypothesis is that there's no difference in the mean ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors. The alternative hypothesis is that Best Actresses are generally younger than Best Actors. The confidence interval, calculated from the differences in the paired ages, supports either the null or alternative hypothesis based on whether it includes or excludes 0.

Explanation:

The null and alternative hypotheses for this hypothesis test are as follows:

Null hypothesis (H₀): μd = 0 (This suggests that there's no difference in the average age between Best Actresses and Best Actors.)

Alternative hypothesis (Hₐ): μd < 0 (This supports the claim that Best Actresses are generally younger than Best Actors.)

For part (b), to construct the confidence interval, you would first take all 10 differences (actress’s age minus the actor’s age) for each pair of ages. Then calculate the mean and standard deviation of these differences. After that, use the t-distribution to calculate the confidence interval with a 0.01 significance level.

If the confidence interval includes 0, it supports the null hypothesis that there's no significant difference in age. If the interval is entirely less than 0 (e.g. (-5, -1)), this indicates the mean difference is less than 0, supporting the alternative hypothesis that actresses are typically younger.

Learn more about Hypothesis Testing here:

https://brainly.com/question/34171008

#SPJ3