Answer :

Final answer:

The statement is TRUE, in a Category II pharmacy, a Qualified Person may serve as the Pharmacist-in-Charge but it's not a requirement for the Pharmacist-in-Charge to be the Qualified Person.

Explanation:

The statement in the question refers to specific roles within a pharmacy setting, primarily Category II pharmacies. The Qualified Person (QP) and the Pharmacist-in-Charge (PIC) are two roles that can sometimes be filled by the same individual, but this is not a requirement. The QP is responsible for ensuring that each batch of medicinal products has been manufactured and checked in compliance with the laws governing the manufacture of medicinal products and with their marketing authorisations. The PIC, on the other hand, is responsible for managing the pharmacy and ensuring compliance with regulatory and legal requirements.

In a Category II pharmacy, the QP may also be the PIC, which means a single individual could take on both the responsibility for product quality as well as managing pharmacy operations. However, it is not mandatory for the PIC to be the QP. Therefore, the statement can be considered TRUE.

Thanks for taking the time to read In a Category II pharmacy the QP may be the PIC but the PIC doesn t have to be the QP True or False. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada