Answer :

Final answer:

Ampliative reasoning is used to generate new knowledge or beliefs based on available evidence, while explanatory reasoning is used to provide reasons or justifications for an observed phenomenon.

Explanation:

Ampliative reasoning and explanatory reasoning are two different types of reasoning that serve different purposes. Ampliative reasoning is used to generate new knowledge or beliefs based on available evidence. It involves making inductive or probabilistic inferences from specific instances to general conclusions.

For example, if every bird a person has seen so far has been black, they might use ampliative reasoning to conclude that all birds are black, even though they haven't seen every bird in existence. On the other hand, explanatory reasoning is used to provide reasons or justifications for an observed phenomenon. It involves making deductive or causal inferences from general principles or known facts to a particular observation.

For example, if someone observes smoke coming from a window, they might use explanatory reasoning to conclude that there is a fire inside the building based on their knowledge that smoke is typically caused by fire.

Thanks for taking the time to read Can you elaborate on the difference between ampliative and explanatory reasoning. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!

Rewritten by : Barada