We appreciate your visit to What is the reason given by DANFORTH for not pardoning the accused 1 Because twelve people have already been hanged for the same crime 2. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Final answer:
Danforth refuses to pardon the accused because it would be unjust, considering that twelve others have already been executed for the same crime, thereby seeking to maintain consistency in the application of justice.
Explanation:
The reason given by DANFORTH for not pardoning the accused is that twelve people have already been hanged for the same crime. He believes it would not be just to pardon those remaining when others have already faced execution for identical charges. Danforth's commitment to consistency and the appearance of justice keeps him from offering a pardon, even if there may be a moral or legal argument for doing so.
Thanks for taking the time to read What is the reason given by DANFORTH for not pardoning the accused 1 Because twelve people have already been hanged for the same crime 2. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
Final answer:
Danforth cannot pardon the accused because it would not be just, considering that twelve people had already been hanged for the same crime.
Explanation:
The reason given by Danforth for not pardoning the accused is because twelve people have already been hanged for the same crime. Danforth states that it would not be just to pardon the others when the executions of some have already been carried out. It is a matter of consistency in the administration of justice, as pardoning the remaining accused would implicitly suggest that the earlier executions were unjust, throwing the legitimacy of the court into question.
