We appreciate your visit to In the 1969 case of the Supreme Court expressly overruled its decision in and declared that the double jeopardy clause did in fact apply to. This page offers clear insights and highlights the essential aspects of the topic. Our goal is to provide a helpful and engaging learning experience. Explore the content and find the answers you need!
Answer :
Final answer:
In the 1969 case of Benton v. Maryland, the Supreme Court overruled its decision in Palko v. Connecticut and established that the double jeopardy clause applies to the states.
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Benton v. Maryland; Palko v. Connecticut. In the 1969 case of Benton v. Maryland, the Supreme Court expressly overruled its decision in Palko v. Connecticut and declared that the double jeopardy clause did, in fact, apply to the states. In Benton v. Maryland, the Court held that the Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Learn more about Double jeopardy here:
https://brainly.com/question/26602409
#SPJ11
Thanks for taking the time to read In the 1969 case of the Supreme Court expressly overruled its decision in and declared that the double jeopardy clause did in fact apply to. We hope the insights shared have been valuable and enhanced your understanding of the topic. Don�t hesitate to browse our website for more informative and engaging content!
- Why do Businesses Exist Why does Starbucks Exist What Service does Starbucks Provide Really what is their product.
- The pattern of numbers below is an arithmetic sequence tex 14 24 34 44 54 ldots tex Which statement describes the recursive function used to..
- Morgan felt the need to streamline Edison Electric What changes did Morgan make.
Rewritten by : Barada
In the 1969 case of A) Benton v. Maryland, the Supreme Court expressly overruled its decision in A) Palko v. Connecticut and declared that the double jeopardy clause did, in fact, apply to the states.
Benton v. Maryland (1969): This case was crucial in the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause, which protects individuals from being tried twice for the same offense, was a fundamental right applicable to the states as well as the federal government.
Palko v. Connecticut (1937): In this earlier decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause did not apply to the states. The court reasoned that double jeopardy protections were not fundamental to a fair trial and therefore did not need to be enforced against the states.
Overruling Palko with Benton: In Benton, the Supreme Court reversed the Palko decision, stating that the Double Jeopardy Clause is indeed a fundamental right. Therefore, it must be applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
